An overview of experimental methods for cam-tappet interactions

Leandro Ratamero

doi:10.14295/vetor.v33i1.15009

Authors

Leandro Ratamero IPRJ-UERJ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5747-6200

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/vetor.v33i1.15009

Keywords:

Experimental Methods, Cam-tapped, Valvetrain

Abstract

In an engine, the valve train is responsible for approximately 6% to 35% of the total friction losses, with the value varying with the design and operating conditions. Even a 1% improvement in the fuel economy of a vehicle model is of great economic and environmental relevance. One of the engine systems subject to considerable friction is the control system and actuation of gas admission and discharge valves, the valve control system. Friction efforts and wear between the cam and the tappet depend on the relative speeds of the parts, the state of the surfaces in contact, the lubrication and temperature conditions, and the materials and geometries of the cam and tappet. A carefully project of the cam-tappet system is needed to preserve parts integrity and system functionality. This work presents some important experiments carried out with various cam-tappet systems, measured on engines or constructed using parts of an engine. Several important quantities are measured and analyzed by the reported experiments. The main objective of this paper is to promote a better understanding of these quantities that can be useful to engine designers to minimize energy losses or for optimize desirable mechanical characteristics of the system. Also, this paper allows researchers to plan new experiments and/or rapidly identify typical experimental results. It was possible to conclude that typical friction coefficients between cam and tappet varies from 0.05 to 0.15, that the force between valve stem-valve guide represents only about 1.5 -2% of the force acting on the valve stem, that the cam-follower friction was low for viscous oil SAE 50, compared with other lubricants, whereas camshaft bearing friction was low for lubricant SAE 5W-40 in the same engine, that the friction at the cam-follower interface decreases with increasing engine speed, that viscous oil gave greater oil film thickness as compared to the low-viscosity lubricant at the cam-follower interface, among others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Roshan, M. Priest, A. Neville, A. Morina, and X. Xia, “A Boundary Lubrication Friction Model Sensitive to Detailed Engine Oil Formulation in an Automotive Cam/Follower Interface,” Journal of Tribology, vol. 133, no. 4, 9 pages, 2011. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004880

B. S. Andersson, “Paper XVIII (iii) Company perspectives in vehicle tribology - Volvo,” Tribology Series, vol. 18, pp. 503–506, 1991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8922(08)70168-8

V. W. Wong and S. C. Tung, “Overview of automotive engine friction and reduction trends - Effects of surface, material, and lubricant-additive technologies,” Friction, vol. 4, pp. 1-28, 2016. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-016-0107-9

L. A. Ratamero and V. Ventura, “Fuel Economy Sensitivity Analysis for DLC Coatings on Tappets,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-36-0027, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-36-0027

J. Angeles and C. S. Lopés-Cajún, Optimization of Cam Mechanisms. Netherlands: Springer Science Business Media, 1991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3572-8

A. Dyson and M. A. Naylor, “Application of the Flash Temperature Concept to Cam and Tappet Wear Problems,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Automobile Division, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 255-280, 1960. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_AUTO_1960_000_026_02

W.-J. Kim, H.-S. Jeon, and Y.-S. Park, “Contact Force Prediction and Experimental Verification on an OHC Finger-follower type Cam valve System,” Experimental Mechanics, vol. 31, pp. 150-156, 1991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327568

M. Teodorescu, D. Taraza, N. Henein, and W. Bryzik, “Experimental Analysis of Dynamics and Friction in Valve Train Systems,” SAE Transactions, vol. 111, pp. 1027-1037, 2002. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0484

H. Baş, A. Bıyıklıoğlu, and H. Cuvalci, “A New Test Apparatus for the Tribological Behavior of Cam Mechanisms,” Experimental Techniques, vol. 27, pp. 28-32, 2003. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2003.tb00126.x

M. Teodorescu and D. Taraza, “Combined multi-body dynamics and experimental investigation for determination of the cam–flat tappet contact condition,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 133-142, 2004. Available at:

https://doi.org/10.1243/1464419042035935

R. A. Mufti, “Experimental technique for evaluating valve train performance of a heavy duty diesel engine,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 425-436, 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1243/13506501JET537

B. Hu, C. Zhoub, H. Wang, and L. Yin, “Prediction and validation of dynamic characteristics of a valve train system with flexible components and gyroscopic effect,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 157, paper no. 104222, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104222